I used to volunteer at this library, which is just one of many that maintains a Facebook account. They have so many Friends! Considering how many people are on Facebook these days, it seems like an amazing way to help patrons stay updated easily and quickly about library services. And I say this despite ambivalence about social networking sites, due to issues related to privacy, especially. But they're undeniably useful. I use my a Goodreads account almost daily, have unsuccessfully attempted to use Couchsurfer (the failure was due to my not paying attention to certain requirements of profiles) and since I've started using Facebook for this lesson, I've reconnected with relatives and high school friends with whom it would have felt much more awkward and random to reconnect with through other avenues.
Also, I find the articles put forth in this article fascinating. An excerpt:
"And after all, there is another way to look at this shift. Younger people, one could point out, are the only ones for whom it seems to have sunk in that the idea of a truly private life is already an illusion. Every street in New York has a surveillance camera. Each time you swipe your debit card at Duane Reade or use your MetroCard, that transaction is tracked. Your employer owns your e-mails. The NSA owns your phone calls. Your life is being lived in public whether you choose to acknowledge it or not.
So it may be time to consider the possibility that young people who behave as if privacy doesn’t exist are actually the sane people, not the insane ones. For someone like me, who grew up sealing my diary with a literal lock, this may be tough to accept. But under current circumstances, a defiant belief in holding things close to your chest might not be high-minded. It might be an artifact—quaint and naïve, like a determined faith that virginity keeps ladies pure.
Or at least that might be true for someone who has grown up “putting themselves out there” and found that the benefits of being transparent make the risks worth it. Shirky describes this generational shift in terms of pidgin versus Creole. “Do you know that distinction? Pidgin is what gets spoken when people patch things together from different languages, so it serves well enough to communicate. But Creole is what the children speak, the children of pidgin speakers. They impose rules and structure, which makes the Creole language completely coherent and expressive, on par with any language. What we are witnessing is the Creolization of media.”
That’s a cool metaphor, I respond. “I actually don’t think it’s a metaphor,” he says. “I think there may actually be real neurological changes involved.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

I skimmed much of that article and it is bizarre to me how some of the younger folks think. I think it is probably still possible to have privacy -- but that we can't expect anything we do on the Internet to be private. Anonymous isn't really. Someone can always find out who you are. I think there must be a middle ground between letting it all hang out and not participating at all. That's where I want to be.
ReplyDeleteI'm astonished at how some of the younger generation don't even consider privacy. I was just told recently, by a 10-year-old girl, that they ALWAYS add anyone who wants as their friend. Their only criterion is that they have a "cute" avatar. When I commented that they have NO idea who the person is that they are now chatting with - she didn't care. She said that only kids would want to be on the social networking site that she was on....
ReplyDeleteTo me (obviously an old fuddy-duddy) that's disturbing!